I personally think I can see a difference in the power. Placement is still everything. Bullet design is a big factor too. I think .277 and .284 bullets typically are great performing and designed perfectly to the velocity range and task. A .224 bullet might be shot from a .22 hornet or .22-250, a huge range. Quarter bores too range from .25-20 or .25-35, .250 Sav. up to .257 Weatherby.
But 7mm or .270, it’s easy to make a bullet that works. Same goes for the old .358’s. I mean who actually has a .358 Norma anyway?!
Some shoulder angles or longer necks do really have a helpful influence that can be exploited. But not generally by the masses.
Roman’s buddies all have fancy rail rifles costing upward of $2500 before optics! Sure they shoot good, they had better! But that old $600 SA Remington .308 should not be left in the weeds. It works as good today as it ever did, maybe better.
-
Can we rename the 6.5 Creedmore?
- WB, 2026-04-07, 06:30
-
I already have been caling it a "new" name
- Gary Reeder, 2026-04-08, 19:09
-
And I thought it was the new 6.5 "Man Bun" (nm)
- Dave H., 2026-04-09, 18:52
- Spot on. 2 ft. Ape hangars before it’s off the lot. (nm) - WB, 2026-04-10, 06:46
-
And I thought it was the new 6.5 "Man Bun" (nm)
- Dave H., 2026-04-09, 18:52
-
The Truly Popular Rifle Cartridges Have Songs Written
- Jim Taylor, 2026-04-07, 15:46
- AI opens up new horizons - John W, 2026-04-08, 16:21
- And movies!… - SPB, 2026-04-08, 09:48
-
270 Short?
- Dave H., 2026-04-07, 07:41
- Good point. ;-) (nm) - ORG, 2026-04-08, 06:52
- There are subtle differences…. Once past 25 cal. - WB, 2026-04-07, 08:24
-
I already have been caling it a "new" name
- Gary Reeder, 2026-04-08, 19:09