Both designs go about the same objectives in a little different way. The Keith/Thompson SWC has a front “driving band” that’s intent was to help keep it aligned transitioning into the rifling on revolvers. The LBT type uses the “ojive” slope to a wide nose in sort of the same way, it has a “bore riding nose”. Given both with a like size meplat, it’s what you like and which is more accurate in your specific gun.
Personally I think any type of flat tip at all helps a bullet penetrate more straight with less deflection. RN bullets seem to tumble and yaw. Depending on the quarry and bullet it may even turn into a RN upon hitting the target.
- 
			Which is better for hunting? RNFP or SWC
	 - drdougrx, 2025-09-16, 04:35 ![Open whole thread [*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png)  - 
			I would think given the same bullet weight and
	 - jthomson, 2025-09-16, 04:49
- 
			Are you talking about the “LBT” style vs SWC?
	 - WB, 2025-09-16, 08:30
- 
			Either one ... use what the gun prefers
	 - Dave H., 2025-09-16, 08:32
- 
			No real preference really. Both are advertised as being
	 - drdougrx, 2025-09-17, 07:34
- Matts bullets is another good place to get them. - Amede, 2025-09-17, 10:58
 
 
- 
			No real preference really. Both are advertised as being
	 - drdougrx, 2025-09-17, 07:34
 
- 
			Either one ... use what the gun prefers
	 - Dave H., 2025-09-16, 08:32
 
- 
			Are you talking about the “LBT” style vs SWC?
	 - WB, 2025-09-16, 08:30
 
- 
			I would think given the same bullet weight and
	 - jthomson, 2025-09-16, 04:49